To be honest, I'd love to be one of those people that "race for fun"....but I am not. Case in point, the upcoming race season that will have to be re-thought because of 3 weeks of injury recovery and partly having no desire to train due to my own laziness, that will result in my not being ready to run competitively. And by that, I mean competitively for ME.

Which leads me back into this rabbit hole only exacerbated from starting behind my expected training plan...what IS a "respectable" time? Add to that question the self imposed, preconceived notion that there's an expectation of what I should race at any particular distance. In my mind: a 5k-should be sub 20 minutes (preferably right around 19 minutes flat), a 10k-should be around 41 minutes, a 10 miler-in the 65-70 minute range, a 13.1-in 90-95 minutes and a Marathon-should be sub 3:30. Now...you might ask...where did those times come from? Truth is...I have NO clue! Have I run those times thus far? In a few events, yes. Hell, I've even posted those times recently (as bad as I hate to say it, closing in on 40) instead of when I was younger (my whole issue with age thing is a totally different post all together). In other events...I haven't even posted those times yet!
Now I would argue that I truly believe those times are within my reach. If I can run a 5:45-6:20 minute mile for shorter distances and close to a flat 7 minute mile for longer events already...this should be doable and not unrealistic, right....right? Well, I guess I better get back to serious training and dropping a few more pounds. I am entering a new age group...ugh.
Do you guys have the same struggle with what YOU think is a "good" time?